Epiphanic Popcorn and Rude Awakenings
Mix in equal parts. Shake vigorously to awaken. In case of potential truth-induced volatility, please remember to take cover. Also, don't feed the bears. In fact, shut up about the bears already....
The Starfire Codes produces an audience-supported publication with a stellar podcast, consciousness-expanding daily spiritual content, and well-researched articles on forbidden but crucial topics.
If you love our work, please join our constellation of curious minds and venture into forbidden realms of knowledge.
Hit that like button!
Share with fellow seekers!
If you haven’t yet, please become a Paid Subscriber to support the cosmic quest for truth!
This is what we do full time. Thank you for all of the ways you support The Starfire Codes! It means the universe to us. 🌟
I have quite a few shorter topics, thoughts, ideas, snippets, and events to cover, so I thought I would condense these into one article.
Thank you to everyone who contributed and participated in thse conversations on the Notes platform.
Users are finding it’s a great conversation and collaboration tool, and if you’re especially tired of navigating echo chambers that are algorithmically stoked to incite aggression or cause dopaminergic dysregulation, I highly suggest giving the Notes platform a try.
It’s a great spot full of thoughtful exchanges among a majority of kind and helpful people looking to build community in effective and nurturing ways, and it’s where I am now focusing the majority of my online energy.
Make an account and come say hello!
You can find me here.
Exiled From Eden
In a recent piece called Exiled From Eden by
at , she discussed Gnosticism and commented that some people consider it the utmost heresy.Please read her piece at the link above to get a better idea of the topics she was exploring and please subscribe to her publication.
Melissa and
contribute work that is open, honest, thoughtful, and powerful, and I always enjoy reading what they have to say.In her article, Melissa supplied the following image:
I restacked her article and added the following:
It’s interesting to me that this is considered “heresy” when astrophysics literally backs the story up.
Make of that what you will.
I’m an “omnist,” I guess, but I hate labels, especially ones that end in -ism or -ist.
I don’t want to make my thoughts synonymous with my idea of self or identity.
I think maintaining a separation there keeps people more honest and less change averse when they don’t feel like they have to defend the ways in which they have chosen to self-identify.
It also allows space for growth and change as people amass additional information.
I like taking in anything I can get my hands on - and I have no dog in that race.
That said, Melissa Petrie, you will find this super interesting:
expressed that the concept was scary and lamented that he might not be able to sleep.This next link leads to some of my own related thoughts and experiences as a channel.
This is a rabbit hole from a while back as I was thinking it through in real time, and as such, it is not completely precise to what my understanding is of this now - but since you’ve read more of my recent thoughts than my older ones, you can get an idea of where these ideas brought me and sort of see a trajectory on how I got there if you compare it to my more recent pieces.
I hope you find my thought-vom useful.
Side note for anyone looking at this: Never delete your old posts.
Being able to watch your own trajectory will be valuable to you later.
Context is so underrated.
I told him, “This was my early conceptualization of it. Reality (both in life and afterlife) seems to be driven by an expectation engine when you take into account synchronicity, manifestation, continuity, and quantum physics in general. When the wave collapses, you will see what you expect to see. You can will your way out of any traps. So don’t lose sleep over it.”
responded the following:Wow—funny enough, at work today, I thought about how I’d heard of the idea that going into the light is a trap, and jotted down an idea for a novel in which souls are sent into a world that is a trap to keep them reincarnating, but where they will be given all the information they need to get out if they pay attention.
I loved your article, and while I admittedly will probably need to give it a reread to fully absorb all of it, it really spoke to me.
It’s really scary, actually, how much evil there is out there. The idea of this whole thing being a trap is so hard to accept, but honestly, it makes sense. Perhaps it really is time to start opening my mind to what’s possible instead of just talking about it. I immediately thought of my mother, and how ridiculous she would find the whole idea (which was upsetting).
It’s definitely easier to stay blind to all of this; no wonder so many people do it. But what you said about guides feeding us synchronicities rings true and offers a little bit of hope through all of this.
What’s strange is that I feel like I’ve kind of been talking about this all along, only until you articulated it so well I never fully grasped it. God talks to us through intuition, and we are all part of God—they’re all things I’ve touted for years, but never took them literally. Karafree and I had a conversation recently about holographic reality. That part is still the hardest for me to wrap my head around.
Hope this made sense, haha. Thanks for sharing this. I’ll definitely watch the video soon.
I told her, “You were supposed to encounter this info now so that you would see and process it because your mind was on it. I had the info you needed, so a sync was created so that I would see your post and give it to you. You willed it in by expecting it. I just happened to have it.”
She replied:
That makes a ton of sense! It seems like all this knowledge is just concentrating in one place all of a sudden. Wish I was smart enough to understand the quantum physics behind it, haha.
Regarding your response to John’s comment, I also had a vivid nightmare last night in which I became lucid (unusual for me) and escaped by the whole thing by willing it out of existence.
Is the answer to the ‘don’t go into the light’ question then to retreat within until you’re somewhere else?
Just spitballing, haha, but this opens so many doors. Thanks for being at the right place at the right time, Demi!
I added, “No problem, love. You will always see what you expect to see. When people have NDEs, they see whatever they think they will see according to their belief system. So the expectation begets the experience. Avoid the artificial light construct tunnel thing. Other than that, remember you can create anything you would like to experience. So whatever you determine you want that to be, it will.”
Melissa thanked me and excused herself to preemptively address John’s potential nightmares.
The omnism part of the discussion reemerged later on in a conversation I was having with Jimmy Shrake about my most recent What I’m Watching post, and I find myself feeling even more strongly about this. It’s clearly something I am working through right now and I will need to pay more attention to it because it keeps bubbling up out of me:
I don't like words that end in -ist or -ism because I don't like tethering my sense of self to ideas outside of self which, I feel, should remain in a state of fluidity if I am learning and growing at every step. That said, I would consider myself, for lack of a better word, an "omnist" because I prefer to find common truths among different ways of thinking rather than marry myself to any particular one of those ways of thinking and then, subsequently, feel compelled to defend it as I would my own limb because I have hung my hat so hard on the ideas of someone else that I am unable to extricate the self from the doctrine. I see a lot of people do that and I think it's incredibly dangerous.
The same emerged in a conversation I was having with
. He expressed to me that the title meme to one of my meme drops ran counter to his way of thinking because questioning everything would run counter to having blind faith.I said that I am even more apt to question anyone telling me not to question anything because it makes me wary of what their motives might be in attempting to restrict my questioning. I feel that anything solid should stand up to vigorous scrutiny - even the concept of belief itself. And Dr. Phinney replied in respect for my position.
Someone mentioned that 1 Thessalonians 5:21 says you should question everything, but please forgive me - I can’t find where this was said. If this was your comment, please drop a comment below and I will tag you in the post to properly credit you. The oversight is not intentional, and thank you so much for contributing!
Keys To Power
of writes, “If commanded to by an authority figure, out of 5 people 1 will gladly to load you into a box car, while the other 3 stand idly by. Winning the game in that context becomes obvious. It’s not about fighting, arguing or pathetically pleading, but rather about the ability to take control of the commands.”I agreed and added:
Sycophantic keys to power end up killed or cancelled when they outlive their perceived usefulness or, conversely, they make a bid for the power position as a last ditch effort when they notice this shift is about to occur, usually in the form of some kind of coup.
It can happen in the reverse too where past power players negotiate positions as keys by exploiting their own knowledge or skill sets to avoid being killed or cancelled (Operation Paperclip would be a great example of that).
I would argue that you “avoid the boxcar” by always being perceived as useful. Your merit, both real and perceived, is your greatest survival asset. There is an inclination of the megalomaniacal to want to keep the gifted, talented, or otherwise interesting as pets. It would buy you more time, in the very least.
I suggested this video, which is an old favorite:
I told him to pair what he had just seen with this:
I added, “Merge the two ideas - this is what has happened to our world. Consolidation of power. Now, add this idea to the other two.” (I had to find it over again on the Internet Archive - it had since been removed from the website it was on.)
Man vs. Bear
Suddenly, my feeds on multiple platforms were inexplicably full of bears.
This was extremely confusing.
at posted a meme in his Friday Funnies series that helped me to understand a bit of what was going on.But the whole thing was still super confusing until I came across a post from
at called Fuck it, bear posting is based! in which he breaks down the entirety of this wacky meme.I restacked his article and wrote the following:
Thank you for expounding on this bizarre bear thing that I have been seeing across my feeds for the past couple of days, Shinichi Haku.
I have been wondering why there was an inexplicable uptick in posts about bears.
I’m confused, though.
Personally, I have absolutely no attachment to needing the external approval of others to determine whether or not I am ok with saying if I think something is true or not.
Is this ridiculous posturing something that the majority of women actually do, or is this more of the manufactured, divide-and-conquer, artifically-stoked battle-of-the-sexes cringeworthy stuff that the mainstream pushes that has ended up filtering into alternative spaces too because, since the advent of smart phones, most have not mastered how to communicate with each other sans screens, period, full stop?
The women I know don't do this, but I will openly admit that my “sample set” is likely skewed to reflect friendship compatibility, and I would find this kind of validation-seeking behavior absolutely nauseating, regardless of gender.
And I know I have seen men who are incapable of defining their own opinions for themselves without relying on the consensus of the group or the approval of those the group views as “superiors” as well. Also nauseating.
I give neither a pass. It’s shit behavior.
Plus, I don’t feel particularly compelled to “fear” men OR bears.
Why is any of this a thing?!?!
Shinichi replied:
Given the huge volume of posts by females and feminized men, it’s fair saying they actually do it. The one that prompted this was so emasculated that the average female likely has higher T levels. Much like the last meme, how much do you think about the Roman Empire or something like that.
That being said, it can hardly be called “artificial” when, for all the LARPing about how scary men are, the females have no fear of being persistently disrespectful and insulting. Which is objective proof they are wrong.
Which is why, like the article says, it serves as an NPC filter. They fear men talking because it counters them. But men want them talking because it counters them more.
Haku’s Law: A factual accounting of their actions is as much or more effective than enemy propaganda.
I thanked him for the thoughtful response, and I told him that I’m so glad I don’t engage in any of this. It sounds as exhausting to live it as it does to attempt to unpack it.
jumped in and told me, “I’ve noticed this too, and it's bizarre to me; people seem to be very serious about it all, too 🤦🏻 Oh well, I reckon weird trends are going to trend weirdly 🤷🏻 At least I had some fun with my ‘bear’ post a few weeks back 😉”I responded, “So bizarre. All of this seems so maladaptive and exhausting. I don’t even understand the compulsion to unpack it. No progress is made. It’s nonsense, and attempts to unpack it only seem to serve to generate more nonsense. It makes me want to go back to the early 90s. I understood the early 90s. 🤣”
Stone replied, “Oooh… the 90s. I. Hear. That! 😁 Is it just me, or are people so desperate for meaning - due to the systematic destruction of true 'meaning’ by we-know-who - that people create phantom wisdoms because genuine ‘enlightenment’ feels like an unattainable dream? Maybe I am reading too much into the reading… you mentioned 'exhausting?’ Yeah… 🤦🏻”
I agreed:
It IS exhausting. Can we go back to the 90s?!?! 🤣
And I think you’re right.
When the thing you’re trying to make sense of literally makes no sense, the act of attempting to make sense of it only generates more nonsense.
So this ceaseless unpacking of nonsense only lends false credence to constructs we should simply be calling out as nonsense and refusing to engage with because they are nonsense.
We should refuse to give it any energy at all. That’s the only way to get it to stop. That would be taking the upper hand.
Getting down into the muck with the people breaking reality with their bullshit is just stooping to their level.
We should be taking the high road and disengaging from the maladaptive bullshit altogether.
It’s a time suck. It feels like it’s meant to be a time suck to keep us occupied with nonsense.
And that extra time could be used for such better things than debating nonsense.
Shinichi added, “You say all that, but my shitposting about the bear meme has a higher view count than any of my more thoughtful Clown World counters by a significant margin, and is also higher than my serious literary work. Though, my memeing does have a point, as the takeaway is learn who you should ignore and avoid.”
I said, “Anything that is part of the meme cycle or the 24-hour news cycle automatically garners more attention than something that isn’t trending or topical. That’s normal.”
Shinichi replied, “True, but seeing that it is the low effort stuff that gathers the most attention doesn’t do anything for my confidence in anyone else.”
I said, “It shouldn’t. The bar is very low and the attention spent on that low bar is very high. This is why cat videos are so popular. Mindless, relatable churn.”
Shinichi responded, “I’m not surprised by it as I’ve seen countless examples already. But these are the same ones who will try telling me I am wrong about Clown World, and if I just do (obviously self destructive thing) it will be fine.”
I said, “They are obviously incorrect. The solution is to stop caring what they think.”
Shinichi replied, “They do not think. They do, however offer meme bait.”
By the end of all of this ridiculousness… men… women… I honestly wanted to sick bears on all parties involved.
Memetic Virality and Rhizomatic Language
In
’s recent article Wait, what??? Can a 'no-virus' meme be 'viral' if there is actually no 'virus'? in her publication , she discusses the need to recontextualize the word “virus” even when we discuss virality as a memetic concept because the concept is spreading a false equivalency through a metaphor that is built upon an unproven hypothesis surrounding the “transmission” of illness.Read Betsy’s article for more information. She goes further in depth on the subject there. And please do subscribe to her publication - she is building a wonderful, accessible terrain resource.
I told Betsy that I agree with her about not perpetuating the metaphor because it is misleading.
I said, “This is why you’ll see many of us using the term ‘rhizomatic’ instead. It’s the term I was guided to use to explain propagation of consciousness sans ‘virality.’”
Betsy replied, “That’s a great word, and very apropos. I find myself, though, wanting to reclaim “viral” and “virus.” Change the valence of the word/s. Maybe.”
I cautioned, “They might be too loaded with disinformation to decouple the new meaning from the old lie. I’ve only seen that kind of recontextualization of language work among cults. When the mind is tripping over the new definition of the word not matching the accepted definition of the word, it causes the brain to glitch for a second. Cults use that glitching split second as part of a larger linguistic indoctrination process to get the person to accept new information because the person’s mind is so busy trying to subconsciously resolve the discrepancy that the person doesn’t have time to question or process the secondary thought being introduced and tends to accept it for rote.”
She said, “You could be right. I don’t have any plans to try to change people’s minds. But if we’re dealing with memes, and they evolve, and we are in a moment when reality is up in the air for many especially with regard to the medical system, so deeper change is possible, I wonder. The original meaning of ‘virus’ is ‘poison.’ Not entirely different from the way it is used by medical science—on the same continuum but more truthful. Since these words have only been used the way we are familiar with for a century, maybe century and a half, and were used another way for many centuries before that, they may be redeemable—like being shifted back into their proper place. Anyway, that’s my thinking right now.”
And I told her I’d seen memes going around that said exactly that.
Here is an example of a description of the etymology of the word “virus.”
It literally means “poisonous substance.”
For those of us who know that we are told what the real play is through the manipulation of language, this should both raise your hackles and show you exactly what it is that we’re dealing with here….
Click here to find out more about booking a personal divination reading, having a dream interpreted, purchasing a natal astrology report, and more….
Question Everything. Why?
In response to the aformentioned meme drop Question Everything,
of restacked the following meme:
He said, “I actually had a similar thought today when my planter tray broke. I should be able to buy something that lasts my lifespan, and they use to make stuff like that! We need an engineering revolution.”
I told him, “I agree. I just had the same thing happen but in the reverse and it made me think of how sick I am of planned obsolescence. I have a 50+ year old Kitchenaid mixer and the whisk attachment finally popped a tine while I was making cookie dough. I replaced it easily enough in a day - but man… 50+ years on a whisk attachment is a great run!! If the new one lasts half as long, I’ll be impressed. Which is sad. We should be improving how long our items last, not devolving. We need to value companies that make solid, long-lasting products.”
He told me, “A 50 year attachment is amazing. Funny how thrift stores seem to have better quality products than stores selling new products. Another gardening related thing happened to me today. We bought a new rototiller, a lot lighter than the heavy duty one we use to have which lasted for ages, and somehow I already ended up bending the steel depth bar. Like wth. Another one that pisses me off is the exhaust on my car, which seemed to be designed to fail right after the warranty expired. I could go on…”
And I had a nightmarish epiphany about this while I was responding to him:
It’s ridiculous the way everything… oh no. It’s worse than we think it is. Shit. 🤯
Our manufacturing plants have been dead for 30-40 years. No one is passing on those skill sets here because no one is doing those jobs here. We don’t know how to make much of anything anymore. We have ghost towns where those factories used to be and everyone is focused on bolstering the cutting edge, which would be AI, superconductors, nanotech, and robotics…. machining would be considered working backwards.
We’re buying everything cheap so it has a limited life span. And when it breaks, most of us can’t fix it. No skill sets. We’ve aged out of them.
So within a few years, if we cease to buy crap and everything breaks, we have nothing left and nothing to rebuild with quickly from scratch.
We’d have to begin again from square one, trying to run expensive machining processes with no money because the coffers are drained out to Ukraine and ridiculous money laundering subcontractors who get nothing done - it’s all pay off money.
It’s a choke point. It’s not just because the corps profit more if we keep buying and so obsolescence is baked in. Obsolescence is baked in as an act of war.
If we have no resources and we can’t turn the resources we have into anything useful fast enough, we can’t fight back. We’re sunk.
Theodore said, “But hey, least the weather’s nice.”
I laughed and said, “Aside from that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?!”
But, in all seriousness, I’d like to call your attention to a recent article written by
at called The 2024 protests are not 2020's - This Time China Will Not Steal Our Future. This piece is important - it will change the way you conceive of our relationship not just with China but with all other foreign and/or global powers/entities seeking to leverage other countries via covert soft takeover.When Elizabeth wrote this piece, I restacked it, quoting the following from her:
As Peter Schweizer describes, “When the Chinese military updated the “PLA Political Work Regulations” in 2003, they included “Three Warfares” to be used: “Public Opinion Warfare, Psychological Warfare, and Legal Warfare.” The Three Warfares speak to a strategy of destroying enemies from within by exploiting their problems and steering unrest within rival countries during peacetime. This is targeting the “soft underbelly” of America.”
And I added that anyone reading it should fully internalize how this works. I said, “Familiarize yourselves with the 36 Stratagems and compare them directly to what was happening over the course of 2020 and 2021. Hopefully, you will all see it in hindsight and then you won’t fall prey to it again,” and thanked Elizabeth for writing it.
To further understand some of the strategies in play here, go to the part about Costa Rica and the IMF in The Weaponization of Trust, Venezuela in They’re Playing Risk With People’s Lives, and El Salvador in Things I Can’t Say: Part Three.
Sometimes, In Order To See Reality, Illusion Needs To Be Shattered.
I wrote a reading called Sometimes, In Order To See Reality, Illusion Needs To Be Shattered, from which
quoted the following in a restack:You are being guided to focus on the virtues of your occupation. Anything or anyone that is attempting to distract you from this becomes the thief of destiny, while conversely, anyone encouraging you to double down on your own gifts, talents, and abilities has your best interests at heart.
And then she said the following:
“On a search to achieve a sense of wholeness”….
Demi, we are so in sync.
‘We search for wholeness.’…is a line in the song I’m currently writing.
And yowza….thief of destiny…..LOVE that. Thankfully, I’m only surrounded by peeps who allow me to hermit up and focus on creating.
I am sending my LOVE to you, my Florida angel! xox
This was my reply:
Rhizomatic!! ⚡️💥🔥
I feel the same way, Jacqueline Rendell - so blessed to have so many people around me who are so supportive of who I am and what I do, who cheer me on as much as I love to cheer them on!
The buoyancy of that combined energy makes all the difference in the world!!
It really is all about matching frequencies - focus on the people who bolster you and pour into them like they pour into you and it creates the rising tide effect we’re always talking about.
The other great part about the rising tide effect is that the thieves of destiny fall away because they can’t match your frequency.
They simply cannot sustain a frequency that high because their patterning is so low vibrational. The frequency is too dense, too heavy.
Most people manifest from a lower frequency. Once you understand manifestation, you come to realize how counterintuitve doing it that way is. Coupled with the law of continuity, and even the law of conservation of energy, it makes absolutely no sense.
There are also major energetic consequences for not manifesting from your heart space and up - it’s not punishment, but if you’re misaligned it can feel like punishment.
Trying to will 3D objects to yourself is wonky af - it’s kind of funny to think of that like using the force, but it’s the most inefficient use of “the force” I could think of.
It can feel like nothing works no matter what you do to “effort” it into place.
Hard work just ends up with spinning wheels and resentment toward others who “make it look easy.”
Those people should be examples and mentors, not objects of ire and envy.
Things start to fall apart all around you to nudge you in a particular direction.
And it feels like an unraveling, but it’s really just the universe talking to you in a long, worn out sigh, saying, “Are you going to make me corral you in the direction you need to go, or are you going to choose it and avoid these falling anvils I’m about to drop on your head?”
I’d rather notice the pattern, avoid the anvils, and manifest from a higher frequency.
But most people think of it like summoning a can of soda into one’s hand. And that’s so silly. 🤣🙏🏻💜💫
Tim Truth and the Deadly Toll of Ivermectin
recently dropped a documentary covering his Ivermectin findings which you can find at his eponymous publication under The Deadly Toll of Ivermectin: Blindness, Comas & Deaths Induced By The Neurotoxic, Genotoxic Poison.I restacked the post to congratulate him on the documentary dropping, and
of responded to me, saying, “He best be prepared for a boatload of exploding heads!! *shoulder shrug for 3 sec before switching to palm on forehead with slightly shaking head. It seems to me that this particular topic leads to more cognitive dissonance than any other. *eyeroll”I told her the following:
I lived through this with a lot of people getting sick from it and then getting better once they did niacin flushes + infrared sauna to release it.
Mostly, you feel it in the joints, from what I hear. I never took it.
Massive joint pain. It gets into your tissues structurally in much the same way glyphosate does until you take a lot of glycine every day and the body starts rejecting the glyphosate in favor of building with better materials.
For one, it was so bad that he was in a wheelchair for a while and then graduated to crutches.
At the end of a month doing the flushes and sauna, he was walking without the crutches again.
So when people try to clap back at me that it’s “safe,” I laugh at them.
Sure… “safe and effective.” Where have we heard that before and when are they going to stop falling for it?
Also, can you trust your own judgment on what constitutes feeling good vs. feeling bad when your underlying toxic load makes you feel low key bad at a baseline that you perceive as good?
How can you tell what actual good feels like if feeling low key awful is the only baseline you’ve ever known?
What in the hell do you have to compare it to?! 🤣
She replied:
Totally!! This is the case for many people, sadly.
Your Telegram channel was the first place I heard it was toxic. Prior to that I was believing the likes of David Avocado Wolfe who was actively pushing it. Upon reading your warning, I instinctively knew it was true because DUH…look where it’s coming from!!
I’ve never taken it either, nor anyone I care about. I have tried many times to help others and share info about it on Natural health channels but got called nasty names and yelled at. Ok Byeeeee!!!!
I replied:
Exactly. People act like their heads are going to explode when you try to tell them.
It’s no different than the reactions we received warning people about the shot.
And yet it’s all the same reaction…
“My gurus wouldn’t lie to me.”
“I was told this was safe.”
“This is saving lives.”
Same exact clap back as the shot.
This goes back to what I was saying in my last article when I went back into the vault.
“And as we saw in my lesson about it, there was an additional relevant side note: ‘When your experience is destroyed, your behavior becomes destructive.’ You have to experience learning for it to stick and become applicable. If you do not, you have no context for what you've learned by rote. And without context, your choices are ill-informed and they have the potential to become destructive.”
Why Do We Care What Other People Think?
I wrote an article called Why Do We Care What Other People Think? which explores a series of conversations that ensued in response to Christopher Cook’s article How Many of These Conspiracy Theories Do You Believe? at his publication The Freedom Scale. If you’re not following his stack yet, please do.
Christopher commented, “This conversation just kept getting deeper until it got so deep, it came out the other side.”
responded, “Rolling with laughter. But then, can you imagine where else this could take place?”Christopher replied, “Only in my dreams.”
I asked, “You dream this shit?! How the hell do you sleep?!?! 🤣”
He replied, “On top of a pile of money with many beautiful ladies.”
To which I responded with the following:
Christopher replied, “This is no dream. This is really happening.” —Rosemary, “Rosemary’s Baby”
And all of a sudden, I started getting simultaneous competing clairaudient hits:
I had two simultaneous flashes when you said that, Christopher Cook - both auditory.
That was weird - they usually come in one at a time. These were almost competing for my attention….
This:
And this. And then a third came in, also auditory, but after:
Jacqueline Rendell, these earworms are reminding me of the Human Vibration video you sent me that I added to the most recent What I’m Watching.
She and Jason are BOTH right though - and the show hosts were correct to keep trying to get them to talk to each other.
It’s a sim AND the functional apparatus is the technology that taps into the dream state to make it possible biochemically.
“Biochemistry is the interface” was the second thing I ever knew I was channeling.
These are all just analogies that are presented to us so that we will understand the energetics of the thing because we wouldn’t have words for these concepts otherwise.
It’s confusing enough WITH the analogies without having to parse through concepts for which we have no understanding, having to try to invent ways to communicate about them on the fly. That just sounds like a nightmare. Ugh. Pun not intended.
Go to the part in here where I talk about the tether dream - it’s both - and it keeps us immersed in an expectation engine. The goal, I think, is to learn how to control it - like lucid dreaming.
And here we are back to the same link I provided Melissa and John in the Exile From Eden section above. The topic keeps reemerging.
commented, “Choosing what we focus to ingest and imagine during the day feeds the dream content at night, determining what shows up materially in the coming days… We have SO MUCH POWER to create what we experience as REAL. Nothing is more exciting to me than understanding this on a practical level and then working with an intention to build and strengthen this muscle. Creating deliberately!! XOXOXO!!!”I agree with her completely.
These three pieces overlap in that they all discuss expanded consciousness, lucid dreaming, dream visitation, the world around us being a version of some form of waking dream that we, in turn, may wake up from as is the case in the film Inception, etc.
Genius describes the origin of the Radiohead track in the following image:
The 1987 John Carpenter film Prince of Darkness contains “dream sequences” which are not really dreams but dream transmissions meant to communicate information as a broadcast from the future in order to avert a series of events that would lead to destruction. The transmission, which is a bit difficult to make out, states the following:
"This is not a dream... not a dream. We are using your brain's electrical system as a receiver. We are unable to transmit through conscious neural interference. You are receiving this broadcast as a dream. We are transmitting from the year one, nine, nine, nine. You are receiving this broadcast in order to alter the events you are seeing. Our technology has not developed a transmitter strong enough to reach your conscious state of awareness, but this is not a dream. You are seeing what is actually occurring for the purpose of causality violation."
Queensrÿche’s Silent Lucidity contains a similar component in which real life might also be a dream. the song is an exploration of dream states as they relate to lucid dreaming, expanded consciousness, and the way we interface with reality while awake.
Also from Genius:
The words mumbled beneath the bridge of the song are the following:
"Visualize your dream. Record it in the present tense. Put it into a permanent form. If you persist in your efforts, you can achieve dream control."
This is a quote from the book Creative Dreaming by Patricia Garfield, PhD. These aren't just lucid dreaming instructions. If you examine the way these are outlined, these match up with Bengston technique, except in Bengston’s technique, you would be cycling through images of what you want to manifest while projecting healing energy toward someone whose consent you have received in advance to accept the healing energy you send. So, these are also manifestation and energy healing instructions.
Special thanks to , Aries Azazel, , , , , , , Jimmy Shrake, , , , , , , , , and .
This is an interesting way to consolidate different conversations on Notes. I like it.
"Who wouldn’t question that hallway? Creepiest hallway ever."
—I went with eight other people (strength in numbers) down into the abandoned subway system underneath Rochester, NY. SUPER-FREAKY!
At first, it was beautiful graffiti paintings. Then homeless encampments. The deeper you went, into the pitch-black tunnels, the dumber the graffiti got—puerile, boobs and penises and all. But then it got weird. Satanic bits. A really, really long poem in beautiful graffiti handwriting, in which a guy waxed rhapsodic about his girlfriend's hips.
Rubble everywhere. Crumbling columns and ceilings. Tunnels heading off in other directions. It was like exploring Moria.
At one point, a guy suddenly appeared next to us with a pit bull on a leash. They had been walking the same distance we had, though the pitch black…without a flashlight. WTH?