Doublespeak: What exactly is meant by "High Risk" and "Low Risk?"
Doublespeak: What exactly is meant by "High Risk" and "Low Risk?"
And why is it so important to your health and safety to think through the messaging?
What Candace Owens may not realize (and none of this is her fault - it’s literally her job to get the information out there as plainly and accessibly as possible and she is phenomenal at it) is that she's inadvertently amplifying their scare tactics and their message which could then be interpreted several ways.
So, that’s what I want to discuss.
Threat assessment: By saying "high risk" people will be kept from "low risk" people, people are going to start *panicking* and *drawing their own conclusions* about what "high risk" and "low risk" actually mean.
Straight from the document: “The shielding approach aims to reduce the number of severe COVID-19 cases by limiting contact between individuals at higher risk of developing severe disease (“high-risk”) and the general population (“low-risk”). High-risk individuals would be temporarily relocated to safe or “green zones” established at the household, neighborhood, camp/sector or community level depending on the context and setting. They would have minimal contact with family members and other low-risk residents.”
In the document, the CDC comes right out and says that they define the general population as LOW RISK. (Which would mean, if the general population is not as susceptible, THIS IS NOT A PANDEMIC.)
They define HIGH RISK as “higher risk of developing severe disease” and they go on to state that their intent is to separate older members of the population from everyone else and put forward a plan to place them in camps for “at least 6 months.”
THEY DO NOT SPECIFY AN END DATE.
They show exactly how they plan to carry this out. Starting in the home, they want to designate spaces where your “high risk” family member can be quarantined - trapped - and you may only enter to see them as little as possible.
Past that point, when they decide it’s time to determine that this “isn’t working” - which is already outlined in this plan that they are doubting the efficacy of household quarantines, so the set up is already there - they plan to use this as the entry point to twist the narrative to put our elders in camps.
“Fifteen days to flatten the curve?”
You still believe this shit…?
Now, they want to round up your grandparents and toss them in a camp indefinitely. And they say for this to be “effective” would require “strict adherence to protocol,” which means that they will attempt to come up with ways to monitor you and ways to attempt to get you to agree to said monitoring “for the greater good” instead of seeing it for what it is - another chipping away at your privacy and civil liberties - and a loaded excuse to incarcerate our elders when they concoct data to say that none of this “works” on the household level, so they push you to think the state should be involved in keeping grandma and grandpa “safe” (read: incarcerated in a FEMA camp).
All the actual data we’ve been reporting on for the past few weeks show us that "high risk" SHOULD clearly mean - TO US - those people who have received the shot. The people who received the shot are the people actually getting sick, even when they are put to sea in ships where 100% of people have received the shot.
So, what is locking up grandparents in spaces with loved ones who got the shot going to do?
It’s going to make your grandparents SICK when they come into sustained contact with YOU if YOU got the shot.
And this is the data they will use to show you “it’s not working.”
Of course it’s not working - THE HIGHEST RISK PEOPLE ARE THE ONES WHO TOOK THE SHOT!
But what if "high risk" - to them - means "high risk" of not taking the shot and agreeing to die?
WELCOME TO DOUBLESPEAK.
PHRASES CAN HAVE DIFFERENT ASSUMPTIVE MEANINGS TO DIFFERENT PEOPLE.
AND THEY ARE BANKING ON YOUR ASSUMING THE LESS NEFARIOUS OF THE TWO MEANINGS AND CHOOSING TO ACT UPON THAT LESS NEFARIOUS MEANING.
Two meanings.
They know “high risk” and “low risk” will be used in the media in ill defined ways. These terms can mean ANYTHING.
And you fall into a trap. A mental prison of your own creation. Because YOU never thought about the word choices hard enough to discern that there might be more than one meaning.
High risk of infection? High risk of contagion? High risk of dissent? High risk of original thought? High risk of immunity to groupthink? High risk of high IQ? High risk of propensity for pattern recognition?
HIGH RISK OF *WHAT* EXACTLY?!
Low risk of infection? Low risk of contagion? Low risk of dissent? Low risk of original thought? Low risk of immunity to groupthink? Low risk of high IQ? Low risk of propensity for pattern recognition?
LOW RISK OF *WHAT* EXACTLY?!
Well... which is it…?
This is Revelation of the Method.
This is exactly what we said was going to happen. When do they NOT create documents on this crap? They've created documents about every other part of their crazy plans, as if these were just everyday PowerPoint documents on marketing plans and not a literal paper trail for genocide.
Can you imagine anyone having gotten a hold of Nazi microfilm on this stuff back in the day? This would be the equivalent. Except these are webpages and Word docs and Adobe PDFs and PowerPoint presentations right out in the open where flippant psychopaths are showing you exactly what they mean to do to you and your loved ones.
And still, no official action is put forward to stop this.
Millions of people have already gotten the shot. Millions. Already likely to die from illness and poisoning. And the CDC wants to lock your grandparents in with them to get them sick too and then round them all up into camps when that “doesn’t work.”
FEMA has hundreds of thousands of body bags. Just waiting.
What are you planning to use those body bags for, FEMA?
For whom are those meant?
And why?